Targeting BCMA: A New Path in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

MM Blog Image 3.30.23

Multiple myeloma is a remitting-relapsing disease that requires multiple lines of treatment. Despite the availability of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and monoclonal antibodies, response rates and prognosis diminish with each subsequent therapy. In triple- and quad-refractory myeloma, median survival is only about 9 months, and less than 6 months in penta-refractory disease. 

Why BCMA?

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is an effective anti-myeloma target due to its specific surface expression on malignant plasma cells and non-expression in normal tissue and hematopoietic cells. 

How do BCMA-directed therapies work?

BCMA can be targeted with CAR T-cell strategies that involve genetically modifying a patient’s own T cells to attack the BCMA target on myeloma cells. More recently, bispecific antibodies have been developed to bind the BCMA target on myeloma cells to T-cell CD3 receptors, eliciting a cytotoxic effect. 

What is the current landscape of BCMA-directed therapy?

Two BCMA CAR T-cell therapies, idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), are approved for the treatment of adults who have had ≥4 lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. More recently, the first bispecific antibody, teclistamab, was granted accelerated approval with the same indication. Additional bispecific antibodies with strong clinical trial data include linvoseltamab and elranatamab.    

Comparing BCMA-directed Therapies

BCMA CAR T-cell therapies require a single treatment but have a long manufacturing time that may not be ideal for patients with rapidly progressing disease. They also require stringent evaluation of organ function, cardiac and neurologic clearance, and an extended stay at a specialized center. In contrast, BCMA bispecific antibodies are available off-the-shelf for immediate use and require less stringent evaluation. Hospitalization is limited to the step-up dosing schedule that mitigates the risk for cytokine release syndrome (CRS). 

CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are associated with both treatment options but occur less frequently with BCMA-targeting bispecific antibodies. Infections are common with both approaches and prophylaxis is recommended. 

Therapeutic Selection

The decision between BCMA CAR-T therapy and BCMA bispecific antibodies for the treatment of multiple myeloma is complex and depends on several factors, including overall patient health, disease characteristics, prior treatments, and potential side effects. Practical considerations may also play a role in the decision-making process.

Want to learn more? Check out CE activity below expiring soon! Join our myeloma experts for evidence-based insights that will help you map the path to optimal patient outcomes.

Exploiting BCMA in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: How Could Bispecific Antibodies and T-Cell Engagement Impact Relapsed/Refractory Disease? Proceedings from a Clinical Olympics℠

Share on Social Media

*Earn Hematology / Oncology Continuing Medical Education Credit(s) by clicking the activity Learn More button.

Exploiting BCMA in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: How Could Bispecific Antibodies and T-Cell Engagement Impact Relapsed/Refractory Disease? Proceedings from a Clinical Olympics